Furtado v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Plaintiff brought two actions seeking to quiet his title to an easement for a ditch across defendants’ lands, which ditch he alleged had been destroyed in part by defendants. He also prayed that defendants be compelled to restore the portions of said ditch which they had destroyed, that they be enjoined from interfering with same, and that he be awarded damages for injuries resulting from the alleged acts of defendants.
Defendants answered denying generally the allegations of the complaint, including a denial that defendants Taylor had destroyed, covered up or filled in a portion of the ditch…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Clark v. RedlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Tract Development Services, Inc. v. KeplerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of Stockton v. Miles and Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Muscoy Mutual Water Co. v. EnloeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950