Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Farness

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 5, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

Pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 7399 and 7950, appellant undertook certain improvements under the provisions of Title 9, Chapter 6, Articles 2, 3 Arizona Revised Statutes. The proposed improvements called for, inter alia, the widening of Grant Road in Tucson, Arizona. To accomplish this purpose, appellant filed this eminent domain action to secure an additional twenty feet of unimproved land along the front of appellee’s property.

The appellee made a motion to dismiss this appeal contending that appellant had *459failed to perfect its appeal within the period provided in A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. WondergemArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pima County v. De ConciniArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Tucson v. RicklesArizona Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. ChiarelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. International Harvester Co. v. ChiarelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API