Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Rickles
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1973No. 10629-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Justice.
In October of 1967, the City of Tucson sued to condemn a 15 by 580 foot strip of land which was needed in order to widen Prince Road on the west side of Tucson. The land had been part of a mobile home park owned by Eugene and Mildred Rickies. In January, 1970, the case was tried without a jury. The trial court entered a judgment condemning the land and awarding the Rickies damages for the land and improvements taken and for severance damages to the remaining uncondemned land.
The City appealed, presenting two questions for review:
“(1) In a partial taking under eminent domain,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY, ETC. v. CannonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- In re Appeal of New York State Realty & Terminal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Arizona Water Company v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GrissomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Scottsdale v. Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Central Christian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- City of Tucson v. Estate of DeConciniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- City of Tucson v. FarnessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.