Legal Opinion

United States v. Ameren Mo.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 27, 2019No. 4:11 CV 77 RWSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Parties move for summary judgment during the remedies phase of this Clean Air Act case. Ameren Missouri (Ameren) argues that I do not have authority to order injunctive relief for past violations of the Clean Air Act, that I cannot determine what constitutes Best Available Control Technology (BACT), and that I cannot order emissions reductions at a non-offending plant. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) argues that there is no material dispute that flue gas desulfurization constitutes best available control technology.

Neither the plain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ameren MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Ameren MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API