Legal Opinion

Salzetti v. Backman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1981No. 17671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order finding the defendants in contempt for failure to deposit rentals in a case involving a lease which wound up in a receivership. The defendants, by affidavit, pleaded inability to make the deposit because their assets were frozen, and the trial court refused to lift the contempt order for any period, temporary or permanent.

Defendants on appeal urge three points to support their request that this Court order the vacation of the contempt finding and decision:

1. That the order finding defendants in contempt is a “final” appealable order. 1 No one on appeal has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Thomas v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Peterson v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Adams v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Huston v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sinclair v. SinclairUtah Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API