Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1973No. 12801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Pursuant to a hearing on an order to show cause issued in a divorce proceeding the defendant (appellant) was found guilty of contempt for violating an order with respect to contacting his minor child. However, no written findings of fact, conclusions of law or judgment thereon were ever entered. We have heretofore ruled that this was a prerequisite to the enforcement of a judgment and commitment for contempt. See Brown v. Cook, 123 Utah 505, 260 P.2d 544 (1953). That not having been done here, it is necessary that the order of contempt be vacated.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salzetti v. BackmanUtah Supreme Court · 1981