Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
We granted review in this workers’ compensation case to examine whether A.R.S. § 23-1024(A) may be construed to require a finding that a worker’s acceptance of compensation benefits is a waiver of his constitutional tort remedy against his employer. The worker argues that such a construction of the statute violates art. 18, §§ 6 & 8 of the Arizona Constitution. Review was granted pursuant to Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTS
1. The System
This case cannot be understood without a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.