Legal Opinion

Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1985No. 18071-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

We granted review in this workers’ compensation case to examine whether A.R.S. § 23-1024(A) may be construed to require a finding that a worker’s acceptance of compensation benefits is a waiver of his constitutional tort remedy against his employer. The worker argues that such a construction of the statute violates art. 18, §§ 6 & 8 of the Arizona Constitution. Review was granted pursuant to Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTS

1. The System

This case cannot be understood without a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API