Legal Opinion

Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. CV-98-0361-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether the exclusivity provision of the workers’ compensation law bars employees’ claims that their employer breached a contract to supplement workers’ compensation benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 5(3).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Nine former and present employees (Plaintiffs) of Brush Wellman, Inc., contracted chronic beryllium disease (CBD), a severe, progressive, and permanent lung condition, as a result of their exposure to toxic levels of airborne beryllium dust while working at Brush…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API