Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether the exclusivity provision of the workers’ compensation law bars employees’ claims that their employer breached a contract to supplement workers’ compensation benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 5(3).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Nine former and present employees (Plaintiffs) of Brush Wellman, Inc., contracted chronic beryllium disease (CBD), a severe, progressive, and permanent lung condition, as a result of their exposure to toxic levels of airborne beryllium dust while working at Brush…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.