In the Interest of T.J.K.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONALD R. ROSS, Justice.
Sam Kersey appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, raising two points of error. He first contends the trial court erred in finding that he waived any objection to the constitutionality of a statute permitting grandparent access. Second, he contends the trial court erred in finding that his reliance on the United States Supreme Court holding in Troxel v. Granville did not establish *831sufficient grounds to modify the previous order.
Sam, the father of T.J.K., a female child born in 1991, Connie…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Missouri Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- in the Interest of O.R.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Spiker v. SpikerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Hunt v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- In the Interest of C.P.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Wanda Jean Spiker And James Lee Spiker, Vs. Sherry Lynn Spiker And Kelly Keith SpikerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006