Legal Opinion
Allen v. Baxter
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1906No. 5866PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered June 22, 1905, upon sustaining a demurrer to the defendants’ answer, setting aside an. attachment and execution levy in favor of a creditor, at the suit of the receiver of an insolvent corporation.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.
— This action was brought iu Snohomish county. The complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows:
“(1) That the DeSoto Placer Mining Company is a foreign corporation, organized under’ the laws -of the state of *435West Virginia, and authorized to transact business in the state of Washington. (2) That during all the times hereinafter mentioned and until the appointment of a receiver, the said corporation was maintaining an office in the city of Seattle, King county, Washington, where service could be had upon said corporation. (3) That on the 29th day of March, 1904, the said Marion B. Baxter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clay v. Selah Valley Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Isaacs v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. HumasonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- F. Chevalier & Co. v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Hardin v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baxter v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Elliott v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1947