State v. Humason
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
' Stiles, J.
None of the questions raised by the appellant which are based upon affidavits contained in the transcript can be passed upon by this court, since they are not made a part of the record by a statement or bill of exceptions. Windt v. Banniza, 2 Wash. 147 (26 Pac. Rep. 189).
Appellant was required to go to trial on the 26th day of February, 1891, upon an information filed against him on the 23d day of the same month, for the crime of stealing certain neat cattle, under Code 1881, § 833. He complains because of his trial having been fixed within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stover v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ingalls v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Graham v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Dyer v. FlintIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WaltersWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. PorteeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. HunterWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. BlissWashington Supreme Court · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.