Legal Opinion
Rice v. Perales
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrew V. Siracuse, J.
The plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment action seek to invalidate a change in the way New York State Home Relief benefits are calculated for "mixed households” in which one member receives Supplemental Security Income. By permission and consent the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction was converted into a motion for summary judgment and the defendants’ answer treated as a cross motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs’ request for class certification is consequently mooted.
Pursuant to the terms of a temporary restraining order signed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tucker v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Rice v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Silver v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Boyland v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pataki v. New York State AssemblyNew York Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.