Legal Opinion

Rice v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs are married couples; one spouse of each couple is severely disabled and receives Federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and the other is a recipient of Home Relief (HR), a New York State public assistance benefit. They commenced this action seeking class certification and a declaration that 18 NYCRR 352.2 (b) is void because it is preempted by Federal and State law. The court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ motion for class certification…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rice v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Franconia Village Cooperative, Inc. v. Lincoln Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Franconia Village Cooperative, Inc. v. Lincoln Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Silver v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Boyland v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Pataki v. New York State AssemblyNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. DSHSWashington Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API