Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Dankel
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 12, 2024No. 4:22-cv-00416Unknown
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ANDREA COLLARD GONZALES, § KEVIN WHITT, DYMPHNA FERREL, § and BRITTANY HENDRICKSON, § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-416 § Judge Mazzant Plaintiffs, § § v. § § AMY DANKEL, CHERRIE SILAS, § ROBERT MONTGOMERY, FARREL § RITCHIE, and BRYANT BAILEY, § § Defendants. § ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants Amy Dankel and Robert Montgomery’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Qualified Immunity (Dkt. #31). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion should…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.