Webster v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
There was no error in tbe admission by tbe trial court, over objections by tbe plaintiff, of evidence offered by tbe defendant. Tbis evidence was competent as tending to corroborate witnesses for tbe defendant, and was manifestly admitted only for tbat purpose. Plaintiff’s assignments of error based upon ber exceptions to tbe admission of tbis evidence cannot be sustained.
Tbe court instructed tbe jury tbat tbe burden of proof on tbe issue submitted to tbe jury was on tbe plaintiff, and tbat unless tbe jury should find by tbe greater weight of tbe evidence tbat tbe plaintiff deposited with tbe…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boris S. Browzin v. Catholic University of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Royster v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Peoples Trust & Savings Co. v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
- Tate v. Sears Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.