Lane v. Ocosta School District No. 172
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.
This is an appeal from a superior court judgment requiring a school district to maintain a particular bus stop for the school children of a family in the district. The school district contends (1) that the superior court did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter de novo, and (2) that the school district’s refusal to reinstate the original bus stops was not an arbitrary or capricious action affecting fundmental rights. We agree with these, contentions and therefore reverse.
During the 1972-73 school year, the five oldest children of William and Judy Lane were transported to school by bus-ses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Hood v. Washington State Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Floyd v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Citizens Against Mandatory Bussing v. PalmasonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. NordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Haynes v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Coughlin v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Arnim v. Shoreline School District No. 412Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.