Legal Opinion

Jaouad v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 11, 1998No. 97 CIV. 4394(CBM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Redouane A. Jaouad and Jose A. Vazquez (“Jaouad and Vazquez”) sued, in the form of a class action, defendants City of New York, New York City Department of Transportation (“DOT”), New York City Department of Finance (“DOF”), and New York City Parking Violations Bureau (“FVB”) (collectively: “the City”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The City moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6). For the reasons to be discussed below, the motion is GRANTED. However, plaintiffs are given 60 days to file an amended complaint.

BACKGROUND

New York’s Vehicle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. New York CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Jaouad v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Wilner v. BeddoeNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Vigil v. New Mexico Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Holmes v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API