Legal Opinion

Wilner v. Beddoe

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judith J. Gische, J.

Decision and order of the court is as follows:

*905Each of the four above-captioned special proceedings challenges a rule, recently promulgated by the New York City Environmental Control Board (ECB), which adopted new procedures for vacating default judgments. The rule, which is codified as title 48, section 3-82 of the Rules of the City of New York (ECB vacate default rule or rule), became effective April 4, 2010.

By administrative order of the Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler, dated November 18, 2010, all cases commenced by petitioners’ counsel, Cohen Hochman…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Boreali v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. York v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilner v. BeddoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. DeCastro v. WambuaNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wilner v. BeddoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API