Lumpkin v. L. & N. R. R.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
— Affirming. ■
This is the second appeal of this ease. The opinion on the former appeal may he found in 136 Ky., 290, entitled Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. John Lumpkin. In that opinion it was held that Lumpkin was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and that the trial court erred in failing to award the railroad company a peremptory instruction. Upon return of the case !a second trial was had, and at the conclusion of *622.plaintiff’s testimony the court directed a verdict in favor of the railroad company.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- L. & N. R. R. v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kentucky & Tennessee Railway Co. v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Parrish v. BurkleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913