Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bolick v. Gallagher

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1954Published

1DissentGehl, J.

{dissenting). I agree that it has been definitely established that an order striking portions of an answer is not appealable. I do not agree, however, that we cannot or should not in this case treat the motion as a demurrer as defendants request we do.

“A motion to strike out in its entirety a separate defense is, in its legal effect, a demurrer.” Williams v. Journal Co. 211 Wis. 362, 365, 247 N. W. 435.

The defense which was stricken by the trial court is contained in its entirety in paragraph 6 of the answer. It is not seriously contended that it does not state a defense, at least pro tanto.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Palmersheim v. HertelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Voechting v. GrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Paraffine Companies, Inc. v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kipp v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API