Legal Opinion

Palmersheim v. Hertel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an action on a promissory note for $5,700. The note was made by defendant Gates to the order of defendant Hertel, and was indorsed and delivered by Hertel to plaintiff. The complaint alleged the nonpayment and protest of the note at maturity.

The defendant Hertel pleaded by way of defense and counterclaim. In the defense it was stated that he had agreed to buy plaintiff’s farm for $17,000 and had deposited with plaintiff the sum of $500 to bind the bargain; that on the 4th day of June defendant was about to abandon the bargain by reason of his inability to get sufficient funds to make…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Miranovitz v. GeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kipp v. LaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Charles v. DenisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Farr v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kanack v. KremskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Valentine v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Farmers Exchange State Bank v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Walmer v. First Acceptance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kegel v. McCormackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API