Legal Opinion

Rappold v. Durocher

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1993No. 92-233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This is an appeal from the Ninth Judicial District, County of Teton, from a judgment for the Respondent (Durocher) as a result of a bench trial. We affirm.

The essential issue on appeal is whether all elements necessary to establish a prescriptive easement across Appellants’ (Rappolds) property were proved.

This action concerns Durocher’s right to access his property through Rappolds’ property. Previously, Durocher’s property was acquired by one, R.N. Lear, in 1940 and 1941, from the original homesteaders. The east half of the property was patented in 1923. The west half of the property was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Keebler v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cope v. CopeMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Downing v. GroverMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Parker v. ElderMontana Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rafanelli v. DaleMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Swandal Ranch Co. v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Brumit v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Unruh v. TashMontana Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API