Legal Opinion

Unruh v. Tash

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1995No. 94-439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a prescriptive easement action. We reverse and remand.

The following are issues on appeal and cross-appeal:

APPEAL

1.Did the District Court err in denying attorney fees to the defendant William Tash (Tash) pursuant to § 70-17-112, MCA?

CROSS-APPEAL

1. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Tash, finding a prescriptive easement for the use of the ditch and a prescriptive right to overflow water onto a portion of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Boone & Crockett Club Foundation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Thornton v. SongstadMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kephart v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rappold v. DurocherMontana Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MEADOW LAKE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. ShoemakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Swandal Ranch Co. v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Amerimont, Inc. v. GannettMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Glenn v. GrosfieldMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Milanovich v. JanicichMontana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API