Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Smith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1958No. 6313PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damages for an alleged breach of a building contract. Upon the issues being joined the cause was tried to a jury, resulting in the following verdict returned in open court:

“We, the jury find the issues in favor of the plaintiffs and assess their damages at $1500.00. Dated June 19, 1957. Joe Jackovich-Foreman.”

Prior to rendering the above verdict the foreman of the jury requested permission of the court to ask it a question.

“By the foreman: Your honor, the question that has arisen that we can’t seem to agree on — to get a clear view of — is the fact…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SnowdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Goldenberg v. LawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. AnallaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sanchez v. Securities Acceptance Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sena v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Scofield v. JW Jones Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Garcia v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Biebelle v. NoreroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API