Legal Opinion
Ernest Vivallava Pineda, and v. Walter E. Craven, Warden of the California State Prison at Folsom, Respondentand
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1970No. 23767_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Pineda, a California prisoner, appeals from an order of the district court denying his habeas petition without an evi-dentiary hearing.
In his habeas petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Pineda attacked his 1964 conviction for possession of heroin and his 1951 conviction for possession of marihuana. He claimed that his 1964 conviction resulted from the introduction against him of evidence that was the product of an illegal search and that his 1951 conviction (used to enhance punishment for the 1964 offense) was ob*371tained in violation of his Sixth Amendment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- John Allen Minor v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Salisbury v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Arthur Raymond Paine v. Daniel J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Goebel v. LauderdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.