Arthur Raymond Paine v. Daniel J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's Colony
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal is taken from the dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus which was sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Paine was convicted in a California superior court on charges of passing fictitious payroll checks. His petition attacked the constitutionality of a ten-month delay in bringing his case to trial and the superi- or court’s order that his attorney produce certain private papers for use as a handwriting exemplar. The district court rejected both of these contentions on the merits and alternatively found that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Richard G. Smith v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Donald C. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Frazier v. CzarnetskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. Warden, Pontiac State Correctional CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.