Legal Opinion

Gulley v. Lillard's Exor.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 8, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Anderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*747Opinión of the Coubt

by Judge O ’Bear

-Affirming.

This action involves the construction of the second clause of, and the codicil to, the will of C. M. Lillard, Sr.

The second clause of the will reads as follows:

“My son, Christopher M. Lillard, Jr., owes me the sum of one thousand, thirty dollars ($1,030.11) and eleven cents as shown by my individual account book, pages 21 and 22, marked on the back thereof “Baptist Church,” which amount of one thousand, thirty dollars ($1,030.11) and eleven cents, I have charged to my said son, the said Christopher M. Lillard, Jr., as an advancement; and in order…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Jones' ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Rogers v. BurressCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. UnderwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Slattery v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API