Legal Opinion

Old Colony Trust Co. v. Underwood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

In 1916 and 1917 the petitioner’s testatrix, Ruth H. Tompson, lent to her son Nahum Ward Tompson sums of money aggregating $15,000, which Nahum Ward Tompson agreed in writing to repay to her with interest. In the same instruments he agreed, that said sums “shall be regarded as an advance to me in the event of the death of Ruth H. Tompson before payment.” No part of these sums has ever been repaid. At the time the loans were made Mrs. Tompson had no will, her heirs at law would have been her three children, who in fact survived her, and she would have left an estate of not less than $200,000.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allen v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. In Re the Estate of HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Estate of VanderhurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bowron v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Clark v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Groden v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. In re Hope's EstateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API