Legal Opinion

Robert Hameetman, Cross-Appellee v. The City of Chicago, Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 30, 1985No. 83-1986, 83-2070Published

1Opinion of the Court

776 F.2d 636

Robert HAMEETMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v.

The CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 83-1986, 83-2070.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued May 30, 1985.

Decided Sept. 30, 1985.

J. Peter Dowd, Jacobs, Burns, Sugarman & Orlove, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Mary Kay Rochford, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before WOOD and POSNER, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.*

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

1

In 1978 Robert Hameetman, a fireman employed by the City of Chicago, was charged by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API