Cohen v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINTHROP, Judge.
¶ 1 Rochelle E. Cohen (“Appellant”), individually and in her capacity as the natural surviving parent of Joseph Eichten (“Ei-chten”) and personal representative of his estate, challenges the court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Maricopa County (“the County”). Appellant argues that the court erred because the County owed a non-delegable duty of care to Eichten, and issues relating to the breach of that duty are a question of fact for a jury. We disagree and affirm the court’s entry of judgment in favor of the County.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1
¶2 From July…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Morohoshi v. Pacific HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castillo v. Yuma County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Hager v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023