Legal Opinion

Morohoshi v. Pacific Home

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2004No. S120903PublishedCited by 47 opinions

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Pacific Home.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Lanterman Act; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 4500 et seq. 1 ), care for the developmentally disabled is provided by private contractors operating, among other services, residential care facilities. The coordination of the delivery of such direct services is the responsibility of “private nonprofit community agencies” called “regional centers.” (§ 4620, subd. (b).) This case involves the tragic death of a developmentally disabled individual resulting from the negligence of the staff of the residential care facility in which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hutton v. HAFIFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Leider v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Optional Capital, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. T. J. v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API