Legal Opinion
Chan v. Counterforce Central Alarm Services Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 11, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In October 2004, the plaintiffs and Winner Technology, Inc. (hereinafter Winner), entered into a contract which provided, among other things, that Winner would install and monitor a burglar alarm system in the plaintiffs’ home (hereinafter the premises). Under the terms of the contract, monitoring services were performed by Counterforce Central Alarm Services Corp. (hereinafter Counterforce). The premises were burglarized on April 22, 2005, and the plaintiffs subsequently commenced this action against, among others, Counterforce and Wintech Systems, Inc. (hereinafter Wintech), the successor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colnaghi, U.S.A., Ltd. v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Furs v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Federal Insurance v. Honeywell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broomes v. Legal Aid Socy. of N.Y. City, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022