Mangasarian v. Gould
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERGER, Justice.
This case comes before us on the defendants’ appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court following a jury trial. We affirm. The facts insofar as pertinent to this appeal are as follows.
On February 24,1979, John Mangasarian (Mangasarian), husband of plaintiff, Mavis Mangasarian, was a passenger in an automobile operated by his son-in-law, Raymond Klein. As the Klein vehicle proceeded along Route 2 in North Kingstown, it was struck by another vehicle operated by defendant Edward L. Gould and owned by defendant Ophthalmology Care, Inc. As a result of that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barbato v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- Schenck v. Roger Williams General HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Morgan v. Washington Trust CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Powers v. CarvalhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Gormley v. VartianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. CarboneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- In Re Victoria L.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- Margadonna v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- In Re Izabella G.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.