Legal Opinion

Narragansett Electric Co. v. Carbone

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 17, 2006No. 2004-195-AppealPublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.

The illegal diversion of electricity powers this appeal. An underground aluminum bypass conductor leading from the front yard of the defendants’ home to an “unmetered” electrical panel in the garage allowed the defendants to receive a substantial amount of electrical service for which they were not billed. The defendants, Bernard J. and Marsha Carbone, appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff, Narragansett Electric Company, on its claims for conversion and unjust enrichment. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Skaling v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  5. Montecalvo v. MandarelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Notarantonio v. NotarantonioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Harbor Houses Condominium Ass'n v. IDC Clambakes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. South County Post & Beam, Inc. v. Brian T. McMahonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API