In re the Estate of Browning
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
Respondent in this discovery proceeding has moved to dismiss the proceeding, to vacate the order in discovery and to vacate the subpoena duces tecum issued simultaneously therewith. The question presented is one of law.
The petition charges that respondent conspired with an employee of deceased and of the estate of deceased to procure certain contracts from deceased and his estate representative under which respondent was to be paid substantial sums of money, ostensibly as the contract price of work and materials. The petition alleges that these contracts were procured through the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Donemar, Inc. v. MolloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re McNallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of BrowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- People v. FergusonNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Midstate Amusement Corporation v. RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1944
- In re the Estate of MartinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of TheirichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957