Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Millard

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1991No. 18272PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Judge.

This dispute arises from an oral contract between a contractor and a partnership for which the contractor constructed commercial fishponds for the partnership business. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of the plaintiff contractor, including the order of the district court denying defendants’ motion to disqualify counsel for plaintiff or to disqualify counsel for the third-party defendants. We also affirm the judgment of the district court awarding attorney fees to the third-party defendants.

The district court made the following…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Paul S. Damron v. Vern Herzog, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API