Mui Ho v. Toyota Motor Corp.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’MOTION TO DISMISS

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is Defendants Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”) and Toyota Motor Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Mui Ho, Shelda Anglin, and Ted Flory’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Class Action Complaint. ECF No. 27 (“MTD”); ECF No. 21 (“FAC”). The motion is fully briefed, ECF Nos. 32 (“Opp’n”),1 34 (“Re*991ply”), and suitable for decision without oral argument, Civ. L.R. T — 1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS in…