Legal Opinion

Clough v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These are four actions of tort to recover for the conscious suffering and'death of James Lucciardi and for personal injuries to Ambrose Knight, sustained when an electric current ran from a high voltage wire to a cable of a crane with which they were working. Knight and Irene Lucciardi Clough, administratrix of the estate of James Lucciardi, each bring an action against the New Bed-ford Gas and Edison Light Company (light company) and the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company (telephone company). In a trial to a jury verdicts were returned for the administratrix of Lucciardi against…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Edgarton v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Hayden v. Paramount Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Pittsfield Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Toubiana v. PriestlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Gelinas v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API