Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Robinson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2010No. 08-16363PublishedCited by 949 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
The district court sua sponte dismissed claims thirteen through thirty-three of prisoner Kavin Rhodes’ (“Rhodes”) second amended complaint (“SAC”), holding that they had not been exhausted, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), which states “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We reverse,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by949 opinions
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Todd Mattox v. Adam EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Erineo Cano v. Nicole TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ramirez v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- May v. SegoviaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
944 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.