State v. Hames

Rummel, J. †

Appellant Hames and Johnnie Goodman were jointly charged with unlawfully possessing and selling marijuana on June 7,1966. Hames was convicted by the jury and then sentenced, while Goodman was acquitted.

One of the appellant’s assignments of error was that he was deprived of a fair trial because of unfair and inflammatory remarks of the prosecutor. However, these remarks did not transcend the prescribed limits of argument. This assignment is without merit.

The remaining assignments of error revolve around the question of whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of…