Legal Opinion

Lingle v. Township of Elmwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Leelanau; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by Samuel B. Lingle against the township of Elmwood for taxes paid under protest. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, •and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The Traverse Beach Association, owns resort property upon Traverse Bay. It was the claim of the plaintiff that he was owner of all of the bonds of said company, and that he owned and controlled most of its stock, and had control and management of the property belonging to the association and its affairs. He caused this action to be brought against the township in which said property is situate to recover an amount paid by him under protest, claimed by the defendant to be due for taxes assessed upon said property. To maintain his case he offered testimony tending- to show that he paid the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General v. Pioneer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Auditor General v. Sage Land & Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Auditor General v. HughittMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Township of Norton v. CockerillMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Fletcher Paper Co. v. City of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Price Paper Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API