Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Union Irr. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 30, 1922No. 23287PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; B. H. Pavy, Judge. Action by the International Harvester Company of America against the Union Irrigation Company, in which receivers were appointed. Prom a judgment striking items from receivers’ provisional account, the receivers, plaintiff, and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

In its inception this was, in effect, a consent proceeding placing the Union Irrigation Company in the hands of a receiver. The plaintiff’s petition contained the usual .allegations of default by the corporation on its obligations, which were admitted by the defendant, and the lower court thereupon appointed Messrs. William Eden-born, of New Orleans, and J. Eranklin Schell, of Washington, La., coreceivers, with authority to continue the business of the company as a going concern. About 10' days after his appointment Schell resigned, and Henry P. Dart, Sr., of New Orleans, was, at the instance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borne v. Alexander Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co. v. Security Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. Union Irr. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Weber v. Press of HN Cornay, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Graham Glass Co. v. Nu Grape Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. International Shoe Co. v. Picard & Geismar, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API