Legal Opinion

In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 29, 1933No. 32230PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ST. PAUL, Justice.

The trial judge has thus stated and disposed of the issues involved in this ease:

Reasons for Judgment.

The record shows that on March 6, 1926, A. I. Picard was appointed receiver of the Clover Ridge Planting & Manufacturing Company, and promptly qualified as such. The controversies in this ease consist of oppositions to a provisional account filed by the receiver, in which he proposes a distribution of cash in his hands amounting to $69,055.84. Of this amount the sum of $68,643.84 was collected from various insurance companies in settlement of the loss of the Clover Ridge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crotty v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Blue Diamond Plaster Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. Union Irr. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Borne v. Alexander Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. Kahn v. Urania Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Rushing v. Dairyland Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API