Legal Opinion
International Shoe Co. v. Picard & Geismar, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 15, 1939No. 20012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PORTERIE, District Judge.
On January 29, 1930, upon a creditor’s bill and answer filed by the respondent, a receiver was’ appointed for Picard & Geismar, Ltd., a Louisiana corporation, 'domiciled in the parish of Ascension, within this district. The decree contained injunctive provisions forbidding any creditor from causing to issue out of any court any process against the assets and the property of the corporation. By order dated February 3, 1930, the receiver was directed to employ a certified public accountant to audit the books and affairs of the company. In the course of the audit, the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Alden MillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- In Re New York, New Haven, and Hartford Railroad Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
- Ernest M. Loeb Co. v. Avoyelles Drainage Dist. No. 8District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945
- In re Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Mayer v. GrosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.