State ex rel. Jeffrey v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
I must dissent from the majority’s opinion because I do not feel that the Industrial Commission’s order was an abuse of discretion. Granting a writ of mandamus is clearly inappropriate where the record contains some evidence in support of the commission’s findings. State, ex rel. G F Business Equip., Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 446, 447 [20 O.O.3d 379], citing State, ex rel. Humble, v. Mark Concepts, Inc. (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 77 [14 O.O.3d 275]; State, ex rel. Davis, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 160 [14 O.O.3d 402]; State, ex rel. Republic Steel, v. Indus. Comm.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.