Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Garfunkel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 1, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maximilian Moss, S.

In this probate proceeding the proponents, who are the nominated executors, move to strike out respondent’s answer on the ground that it does not raise any triable issue, and for such other and further relief as may seem just and proper. Respondent’s preliminary ground in opposition is that the notice of motion is not supported by affidavit. None is necessary on a motion addressed to the pleadings (Matter of Froehlich, 162 Misc. 768; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 109, 112).

In the propounded instrument decedent gives the net estate in equal shares to five children, including the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of LathamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. In re the Estate of KennedyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. Farrell v. ZibroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HaagNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  5. In re the Estate of RosenfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mardan Construction Corp. v. Rogers Auto Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re the Estate of SerinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API