Legal Opinion

Lightner v. Russell & Pugh Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. 5888PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J. —

In this action respondent (plaintiff below) seeks to recover an alleged balance due for logs and timber sold and delivered to appellant and one Christy (defendants below). The original complaint was filed by Bert Lightner as plaintiff and alleged the corporate capacity of defendant corporation; that in the transaction thereafter alleged defendant Christy was its authorized agent; that plaintiff, between May 1, 1928, and July 1, 1928, sold and delivered certain logs and timber of the agreed value of $1,327.72 to defendants, who each orally promised to pay the purchase price…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Cochran v. GritmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Watkins v. Mountain Home Co-operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kerby v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Maroun v. Wyreless Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. White v. DoneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Commercial Insurance Co. v. Hartwell Excavating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API