Legal Opinion
Lentz v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 2006No. Civil Action 06-1374 (ESH)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Karen Anne and Gerald Lentz, who reside in Maine, filed this action in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia for injuries associated with Mrs. Lentz’s in útero exposure to diethylstilbes-trol (“DES”). Defendant Eli Lilly, an Indiana corporation, removed the suit to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, and now moves to transfer it to the United States District Court for the District of Maine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Defendant argues that transfer to the District of Maine would serve the interests of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Center for Environmental Science Accuracy and Reliability v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. MiskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dean v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Associated Producers, Ltd. v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.