Legal Opinion

Ahia v. Cain

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1924No. 1533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PETERS, C. J.

Quo warranto proceedings were instituted in the circuit court of the first circuit to test the legality of the incumbency of Louis S. Cain as city and county engineer of the City and County of Honolulu. The respondent demurred to the writ and certain questions of law raised by the demurrer were reserved to this court, all of which may be resolved into the one question of whether the respondent was at the time of the institution of the proceedings the do jure city and county engineer of the City and County of Honolulu. The petitioners contend that he was not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. Herring v. LeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Territory Ex Rel. Sylva v. MoritaHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ahia v. AbshireHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Territory Ex Rel. Sylva v. MoritaHawaii Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API