Legal Opinion

United States v. Eaton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1898No. 174PublishedCited by 79 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. In October, 1890, Sempronius H. Boyd was commissioned as minister resident and consul-general of the United States to Siam; he qualified and proceeded to his post, and was in Juné, 1892, engaged in the discharge of his official duties. At that time, being seriously ill, Boyd was granted by the President a leave of absence.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. In October, 1890, Sempronius H. Boyd was commissioned as minister resident and consul-general of the United States to Siam; he qualified and proceeded to his post, and was in Juné, 1892, engaged in the discharge of his official duties. At that time, being seriously ill, Boyd was granted by the President a leave of absence. Before leaving Bangkok, Siam, Boyd, to-quote from the findings of fact, “ believing his illness would terminate fatally, and being desirous to protect the interests of the Government during his absence and until the then expected arrival…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice "White,

after making the foregoing statement of the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The errors relied upon to obtain a reversal rest on three contentions: 1st. That the appointment of Eaton as acting vice-consul was without warrant of law, and hence not susceptible of ratification by the State Department. 2d. Even if the appointment was authorized by law, the statute conferring the power was in violation of the Constitution of the United States. 3d. Because, even conceding the appointment to have been valid, the court allowed a sum in excess of the amount which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Ballew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. United States v. Le BaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. United States v. MosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Arthrex, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API